Citation

Esteban J, Mayoral L, Ray D. Science 2012; 336(6083): 858-865.

Affiliation

Institut d'Anàlisi Económica, CSIC and Barcelona GSE, ES08193, Spain.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2012, American Association for the Advancement of Science)

DOI

10.1126/science.1222240

PMID

22605763

Abstract

Over the second half of the 20th century, conflicts within national boundaries became increasingly dominant. One-third of all countries experienced civil conflict. Many (if not most) such conflicts involved violence along ethnic lines. On the basis of recent theoretical and empirical research, we provide evidence that preexisting ethnic divisions do influence social conflict. Our analysis also points to particular channels of influence. Specifically, we show that two different measures of ethnic division--polarization and fractionalization--jointly influence conflict, the former more so when the winners enjoy a "public" prize (such as political power or religious hegemony), the latter more so when the prize is "private" (such as looted resources, government subsidies, or infrastructures). The available data appear to strongly support existing theories of intergroup conflict. Our argument also provides indirect evidence that ethnic conflicts are likely to be instrumental, rather than driven by primordial hatreds.

Language: en