Citation

Nichols-Hadeed CA, Cerulli C, Kaukeinen K, Rhodes KV, Campbell JC. Fam. Court Rev. 2012; 50(1): 150-158.

Affiliation

University of Rochester Medical Center Department of Psychiatry Research 300 Crittenden Blvd. Rochester, NY 14642 585-275-6740 Corey_nichols@urmc.rochester.edu.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2012, Association of Family and Conciliation Courts, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01436.x

PMID

22661908

PMCID

PMC3364605

Abstract

Every day, judges are faced with decisions regarding intimate partner violence (IPV) victims' requests for protection orders, custody arrangements, and visitation schedules. To make informed decisions, judges must understand victims' risk for future violence. This mixed method study explores the extent to which protection order petitions (n=169) communicate victims' current danger and future risk of violence. Methods included interviews coupled with an archival review of court petitions. Findings suggest judges are inadequately prepared to render decisions to improve victim safety in the absence of standardized risk assessments. The Danger Assessment provides an evidence-based solution to routinize intake interviews with victims petitioning the court.

Language: en