CONTACT US: Contact info
|
Citation |
Paul G, Wischniewski S. Ergonomics 2012; 55(9): 1115-1118. |
|
Affiliation |
School of Public Health and Social Work , Queensland University of Technology , Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059 , Australia. |
|
Copyright |
(Copyright © 2012, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group) |
|
DOI |
|
PMID |
22676278 |
|
Abstract |
Digital human models (DHM) have evolved as useful tools for ergonomic workplace design and product development, and found in various industries and education. DHM systems which dominate the market were developed for specific purposes and differ significantly, which is not only reflected in non-compatible results of DHM simulations, but also provoking misunderstanding of how DHM simulations relate to real world problems. While DHM developers are restricted by uncertainty about the user need and lack of model data related standards, users are confined to one specific product and cannot exchange results, or upgrade to another DHM system, as their previous results would be rendered worthless. Furthermore, origin and validity of anthropometric and biomechanical data is not transparent to the user. The lack of standardisation in DHM systems has become a major roadblock in further system development, affecting all stakeholders in the DHM industry. Evidently, a framework for standardising digital human models is necessary to overcome current obstructions. Practitioner Summary: This short communication addresses a standardisation issue for digital human models, which has been addressed at the International Ergonomics Association Technical Committee for Human Simulation and Virtual Environments. It is the outcome of a workshop at the DHM 2011 symposium in Lyon, which concluded steps towards DHM standardisation that need to be taken. Language: en |