SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Titchener K, White M, Kaye S. Proc. Australas. Road Safety Res. Policing Educ. Conf. 2009; 13.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2009, copyright holder varies, Publisher Monash University)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The current research focussed on identifying features that are salient to drivers in their risk perception judgements for 19 in-vehicle distractions. Both technological (e.g. mobile phones) and non technological (e.g. eating) distractions were considered. Analysis identified that males and females were rating 7 of the 19 distractions differently. The current paper presents the data for the female participants. Multidimensional scaling analysis identified three main dimensions contributing to female drivers' risk perception judgements. Qualitative characteristics such as the level of exposure to a distraction were identified as significant contributors to drivers' risk perception as well as features inherent in the distractions such as distractions being related to communication. This exploratory work contributes to better understanding female drivers' perceptions of risk associated with in-vehicle distractions.


Keywords: Driver distraction

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print