Citation

White M. Proc. Australas. Road Safety Res. Policing Educ. Conf. 2006; 10.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2006, copyright holder varies, Publisher Monash University)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The excuse Sorry, mate, I didn't see you is so familiar to motorcyclists and cyclists that its acronym SMIDSY is entering common usage. As well as failing to notice cyclists and motorcyclists, drivers can fail to notice almost any other relevant component of the road scene, such as traffic lights, pedestrian crossings, cars and even parked semi-trailers. At the broadest level, there are two types of cause for a failure to notice something: internal visual/psychological causes and external environmental causes (such as poor road lighting). Both types of cause will normally be involved in any instance of a failure to notice something. This selective review of the literature will focus on one type of internal cause: the looked-but-failed-to-see error. It is difficult to believe that a responsible driver can look-but-fail-to-see a motorcyclist or cyclist before it is too late to avoid a collision. This paper proposes a plausible scientific explanation for that failure. In the first section, it is noted that crash investigators are beginning to accept the reality of the looked-but-failed-to-see error. In the second section, the findings of recent vision research on inattentional blindness and change blindness are summarised. In the third section, it is proposed that genuine looked-but-failed-to-see errors could be instances of inattentional/change blindness.


Keywords: Driver distraction;