SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Hershkowitz I, Orbach Y, Lamb ME, Sternberg KJ, Horowitz D. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 2001; 15(3): 235-248.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2001, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1002/acp.699

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Forensic interviewers guided 46.4- to 13-year-old alleged victims of sexual abuse to recall the context in which the reported incidents had taken place. A comparable group of 50 alleged victims were interviewed using an interview protocol that was identical except that the mental context reinstatement (MCR) techniques were not included. MCR did not increase the total number of event-related details reported, but it did lead children to reported proportionally more details (55% versus 46%) in response to invitations rather than focused prompts. Such information is more likely to be accurate. MCR had an especially powerful effect on the youngest children (4- to 6-year-olds) studied. The results suggest that non-suggestive contextual cues may indeed be useful in forensic interviews. Published in 2001 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print