SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Beitsch LM, Kodolikar S, Stephens T, Shodell D, Clawson A, Menachemi N, Brooks RG. Public Health Rep. (1974) 2006; 121(6): 737-745.

Affiliation

Center for Medicine and Public Health, Florida State University College of Medicine, 1115 W. Call St., Tallahassee, FL 32306-4300, USA. les.beitsch@med.fsu.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2006, Association of Schools of Public Health)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

17278409

PMCID

PMC1781915

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Given the national effort to respond to the challenge of terrorism post-9/11, this study examined the organizational structure of state public health preparedness programs across the country, their administration, and the personnel and resources supported through federal cooperative agreements and state funds. METHODS: In Fall 2004, the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials surveyed state public health preparedness directors of all 50 states and territories of the United States regarding the organizational structure, administration, personnel, and resources of the state public health preparedness programs. RESULTS: Individuals representing 45 states and the District of Columbia responded to the web-based questionnaire for a response rate of 88.2%, States tended to subdivide their organizations into regions for preparedness purposes. More than half the established preparedness regions (53.8%) were created post-9/11. Preparedness program directors frequently reported directly to either the state health official (40.0%) or a deputy state health official (33.3%). Responsibility for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) cooperative agreements was predominantly vested in one person (73.3%). Federal resources were found to support needed preparedness workforce (CDC mean = 117.1 full-time equivalents [FTEs]; HRSA mean = 10.6 FTEs). In addition, 36.6% of the states also contributed to the public health preparedness budget. CONCLUSIONS: This study of state public health agency preparedness provides new information about state-level organizational structure, administration, and support of preparedness programs. It offers the first comprehensive insights into the approaches states have adopted to build infrastructure and develop capacity through CDC and HRSA funding streams.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print