Citation

Newton M. Baillieres Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2013; 27(1): 77-90.

Affiliation

Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics, Gynaecology 26, Caterham, Surrey CR3 5SY, UK. Electronic address: marynewton@btinternet.com.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2013, Baillière Tindall)

DOI

10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.08.020

PMID

23062592

Abstract

Complainants of sexual assault may disclose to different agencies, the police and health professionals being the most likely. It is possible for certain evidence types to be collected before a clinical forensic assessment takes place that do not require the need for a Forensic Medical Practitioner. If the time frames after the incident and the nature of assault warrant the need for a forensic medical examination of either a complainant or a suspect, this should only be conducted by doctors and nurses who have received relevant, up-to-date specialist theoretical and practical training. Clear evidence shows that few other criminal offences require as extensive an examination and collection of forensic evidence as that of a sexual assault. The forensic evidence in a case may identify an assailant, eliminate a nominated suspect(s), and assist in the prosecution of a case. The elements of forensic medical examination, reviewed in this chapter, are those that are the most varied across jurisdictions around the world currently. Key focus points of this chapter are considerations for early evidence collection, utilising dedicated medical examination facilities for sample collection, contamination issues associated with evidence collection and certain practical aspects of forensic sampling methods which have evolved given results identified by Forensic Scientists processing evidential samples in sexual assault cases, Some of the problems encountered by the forensic science provider will also be discussed.

Language: en