Citation

Roudsari BS, Nathens A, Koepsell T, Mock C, Rivara FP. Injury 2006; 37(7): 614-621.

Affiliation

Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States; Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2006, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.injury.2006.02.010

PMID

16769309

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In order to design multicentre studies an estimate of the correlation of the observations within each centre is necessary. A standard measure of the correlation between observations within each centre is the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). METHOD: We used the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). By 2004, 448 trauma centres (including 110 level I and 123 level II trauma centres) from 43 states and US territories contributed over 1.2 million records to the NTDB. Data of patients directly transported from the scene of injury to level I or II trauma centres were used to calculate the ICC of in-hospital trauma fatality and emergency department (ED) shock rate. RESULTS: The ICCs of ED shock and in-hospital fatality rate were 0.010 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.003-0.018) and 0.039 (95% CI: 0.028-0.050), respectively. The ICC of shock in the ED was the highest for penetrating injuries (0.017, 95% CI: 0.003-0.032) and the lowest for women (0.008, 95% CI: 0.002-0.013) although the observed difference between men and women was not statistically significant. The ICC of trauma fatality was the highest for penetrating injuries (0.073, 95% CI: 0.047-0.098), and the lowest for blunt injuries (0.029, 95% CI: 0.020-0.037). DISCUSSION: Although the calculated ICCs might seem so small as to be ignored, the required sample size in studies with exclusively exposed or non-exposed clusters depends on the ICC and the average number of subjects within clusters. Therefore, investigators should be aware of the influence that these ICCs might have on sample size and power of their studies.

Language: en