SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Monk CA, Kidd DG. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 2008; 52(4): 403-407.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2008, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/154193120805200443

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Research has suggested that the duration of an interruption can affect the time it takes to resume an interrupted task. According to the memory for goals model, goal activation gradually decays over time. Therefore goals that have been suspended for longer will require a greater amount of strengthening and time to retrieve. Whereas most interruptions research has examined interruptions ranging from 5 seconds to several minutes, there are both theoretical reasons and empirical evidence to suggest that interruptions as short as 250 ms can lead to delays in task resumption. The effects of brief interruptions were investigated across two studies. In the first study, participants were interrupted for 250 ms and 5000 ms. In the second study, participants were interrupted for 500 ms, 1000 ms, and 2000 ms. Findings indicated that interruptions as brief as 500 ms can delay resumption. Additionally, resumption delays tended to increase as a function of interruption duration.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print