Citation

Oskarsson PA, Eriksson L, Lif P, Lindahl B, Hedström J. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 2008; 52(18): 1287-1291.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2008, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/154193120805201828

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

We investigated three types of display combinations for threat cueing in a simulated combat vehicle. The display combinations consisted of two bimodal combinations, a visual head-up display (HUD) combined with 3D audio; a tactile torso belt combined with 3D audio; and a multimodal combination, the HUD, tactile belt, and 3D audio combined. The participant's main task was to as fast as possible align the heading of the combat vehicle with the displayed direction to a threat. To increase general task difficulty and provide a secondary measure of mental workload, the participant also was required to identify radio calls. Threat localization accuracy was highest and reaction time shortest with the use of both the HUD combined with 3D audio and with the multimodal display. Subjective ratings of perception of initial threat direction were most positive for both the tactile belt combined with 3D audio and for the multimodal display. The ratings of perceived threat direction at the final phase of threat alignment, however, were most positive for the HUD combined with 3D audio and for the multimodal display. Thus, the multimodal display with HUD, tactile belt, and 3D audio combined proved to be beneficial for all measures.

Language: en