Citation

Yin D, Qiu TZ. Transp. Res. Rec. 2011; 2265: 244-252.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2011, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences USA, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.3141/2265-27

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Modern roundabouts are more and more widely used at both urban and rural intersections in North America. The results of traffic operations analysis at roundabouts often depend on the software used and parameters adopted. For an evaluation of types of traffic analysis tools on roundabout operations, a macroscopic traffic analysis software (SIDRA) and a microscopic simulation package (VISSIM) were used to analyze a two-lane roundabout at the intersection of two rural arterial highways in Alberta, Canada. A full range of traffic flow rates and left-turn proportions was loaded to the roundabout to compare the two traffic analysis tools and to evaluate the effects of different factors on the roundabout performance. Average control delay and 95% queue length were used as measures of effectiveness. Factors such as total traffic flow rate and left-turn vehicle proportion in each approach were analyzed to evaluate the sensitivity of the roundabout performance at different factor levels. The results showed that there was no significant difference for the delays predicted by VISSIM simulation and SIDRA at medium-to-high traffic flow rates and at all left-turn proportion levels. The 95% queue length predicted by VISSIM was longer than those predicted by SIDRA. Good correlation existed between predicted delays and 95% queue length from the two types of software. Both types of software needed parameter calibration for local traffic conditions. Roundabout capacity could also be estimated from a delay curve obtained from the method presented in this study.