Citation

Smith A. Violence Vict. 2001; 16(1): 91-111.

Affiliation

Seton Hall University, South Orange, NJ, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2001, Springer Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

11281227

Abstract

This article reports the findings from an exploratory survey of battered women's views about mandatory arrest, mandatory reporting by doctors and nurses, no-drop policies, confidentiality laws, privilege laws, court-victim advocate programs, and specialized domestic violence courts. Although there was general support for the adoption of these laws, some variation based on demographic and situational circumstance was found. These findings raise questions about the universalistic nature of polices developed to address the problem of domestic violence. Battered women are not a homogeneous group, and public policy may be better designed to accommodate the individual needs of victims.

Language: en