SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Labio RS, Rowan CP, Shattuck LG. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 2006; 50(5): 694-698.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2006, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/154193120605000517

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Digital command and control systems have contributed to the success of the U. S. military in combat in recent years. Force XXI Battle Command Brigade and Below (FBCB2) and Blue Force Tracker are examples of systems that have provided an advantage on the battlefield. However, interface design of these systems has not been optimal, especially when they are employed in high stress and mobile environments. The present study examined the effects of input device (touch screen or trackball), button size (small, medium, large), and road conditions (still, highway, off-road) on performance. The dependent variables were accuracy, reaction time, and motion sickness. The experimenters tested seven undergraduate freshmen from the U.S. Military Academy. The data show that a touch screen monitor with large button size is optimal for moving vehicles. These findings have important implications for the design of human-machine systems expected to operate on the move.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print