SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Heckman GM, Kim RS, Lin S, Rauschenberger R, Young DE, Lange R. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 2012; 56(1): 2236-2240.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2012, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/1071181312561471

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

In-vehicle rearview camera displays may soon be required in all new vehicles as a means of providing drivers with increased capability to monitor the area directly behind the rear bumper. The present work extends findings reported by Kim et al. (2012) by conducting more in-depth examinations of drivers' eye movements to rearview camera displays during backing. Drivers performed a series of backing maneuvers on a closed test course in a vehicle equipped with one of three rearview camera displays (in-mirror (IMD), small console (SD), or large console (LD)) or no display (ND). Drivers wore a head-mounted eye tracker, and eye movements were evaluated with particular focus on four areas-of-interest: the rearview camera display, the rearview mirror, and the two side mirrors. In the present paper, the proportion of time spent gazing at the rearview camera display was evaluated as a function of display location, the type of backing maneuver, and driver age. Gaze durations were longest for the IMD relative to the two console displays, for drivers 18-39 years old compared to older drivers, and when drivers backed into a parking stall between two parked cars relative to other types of backing maneuvers. The age and task factors operated independently of display location.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print