SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Kim J, Cohn L, Shu N. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2013; 133(5): 3588.

Affiliation

Civil Eng., Arizona State Univ., 472W. Carob Dr., Chandler, AZ 85248ghim96@gmail.com.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2013, American Institute of Physics)

DOI

10.1121/1.4806616

PMID

23655948

Abstract

Median barriers are widely used on roadways in the United States. The main purpose of this paper was to evaluate a median barrier performance in reducing traffic noise using the latest FHWA Traffic Noise Model, TNM version 2.5. For this study, median barriers were modeled on three different roadway configurations-at grade, depressed, and elevated. The analysis results indicated that the range of insertion loss for a median barrier at grade was less than 1.5 dBA with a barrier height of 2.5 to 10 ft. The range of insertion loss for a median barrier on a depressed roadway (5, 10, and 20 ft below grade) was 0 to 2.8 dBA with a barrier height of 2.5 to 4.5 ft and insertion loss increased up to 4.3 dBA with a taller barrier height of 6 to 10 ft. On an elevated roadway (5, 10, and 20 ft above grade), the range of insertion loss for a median barrier was 0 to 1.7 dBA with a barrier height of 2.5 to 10 ft. Given the results of this research, it is reasonable to conclude that a standard median barrier would not provide a significant level of noise reduction. Furthermore, taller median barriers do not alter this conclusion. When considering the construction of very tall median barriers for noise reduction purposes, the costs would far outweigh the relatively minimal benefits of this approach.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print