Citation

Kis M, Saunders FW, Kis M, Irrcher I, Tator CH, Bishop PJ, Ten Hove MW. Clin. J. Sport. Med. 2013; 23(6): 470-477.

Affiliation

*Department of Neurosurgery, Trillium Health Centre, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada; †Department of Neurosurgery, Kingston General Hospital, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; ‡Unaffiliated; §Department of Ophthalmology, Hotel Dieu Hospital, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; ¶Toronto Western Hospital, and Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and ‖Department of Kinesiology, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2013, Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine, Publisher Lippincott Williams and Wilkins)

DOI

10.1097/JSM.0b013e318295a80f

PMID

24080785

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:: Helmet use is the primary form of head protection against traumatic brain injury. Although helmet designs have proven to be effective in reducing the incidence of skull fracture and major traumatic brain injury, there is little evidence that helmets protect against concussion. Linear and rotational accelerations are important mechanisms underlying concussion, yet current testing protocols do not account for rotational acceleration. Technical considerations have prevented a valid, accurate, and reproducible testing paradigm. Our objectives were to design a novel helmet-testing methodology that accurately and reliably measures rotational acceleration at injury-relevant impact forces, locations, and planes and to evaluate differences in rotational force protection in commercially available helmets. SETTING:: Laboratory study. INTERVENTION:: The Kingston Impact Simulator (KIS unit) was used to study 10 commercially available hockey helmets. The rotational acceleration force protection was measured in the horizontal, coronal, and sagittal planes at each of 12 predetermined impact locations. RESULTS:: Mean peak unhelmeted and helmeted accelerations at all impact locations and planes ranged from 63 to 28.6 g and from 26.8 to 8.0 g, respectively. The percent reduction in rotational acceleration for all test helmets ranged from 6.4% to 84%. Statistically significant differences in rotational acceleration between manufacturers and within a helmet brand were identified. CONCLUSIONS:: KIS is a novel testing methodology that identifies rotation force protection within and between hockey helmet models and manufacturers at different impact location and planes. This information may be useful in improving future helmet design and construction to provide maximal protection against the forces causing concussion.

Language: en