|
Abstract
|
AUTHOR'S ABSTRACT:
Research indicates that adjudicated men who batter are more likely to be socially isolated and less socially connected than men who do not exhibit assaultive behaviors. This study compared sixty-eight men (Batterer n=39 (Caucasian n=18, Native American n=19, Other N=2/rbrack; Controls N=29 (Caucasian n=15, Native American n=14, Other n=2/rbrack) from Northern British Columbia, Canada, on MMPI-2 variables reflecting social isolation. Controls were matched by age (+/- 2 years) and ethnic background in order to provide more meaningful comparisons. Data regarding family of origin, social economic status, perception of available supports, and numbers of persons included as supports were also compared. Variables were analyzed utilizing t-tests of independent samples and chi-square. Batterers scored significantly higher than Controls on variables measuring social isolation and significantly lower on variables reflective of social connectedness to their communities. Regardless of ethnic background, Controls were found to have greater numbers of supports and to be more satisfied with the adequacy of supports. Batterers preferred to access support from family doctors, social workers or lawyers, whereas Controls preferred to access support from a priest or minister. Implications for domestic violence intervention are explored in light of these research findings. (Abstract Adapted from Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, 1998. Copyright © 1998 by Gene Jonathan Lubow; University Microfilms International)
Domestic Violence Causes
Domestic Violence Offender
Adult Male
Adult Violence
Adult Offender
Spouse Abuse Causes
Spouse Abuse Offender
Male Offender
Male Violence
Canada
British Columbia
Social Isolation
Partner Violence
Violence Against Women
Socioeconomic Status
Social Support Networks
06-04 |