Citation

Racy M, Al-Nammari S, Hing CB. Injury 2014; 45(3): 624-628.

Affiliation

CT2 Orthopaedics, St George's Hospital, Tooting, UK. Electronic address: m.racy@doctors.org.uk.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.020

PMID

24219900

Abstract

Trauma registries are used worldwide to coordinate patient care as well as provide data for audit and research purposes. National registries collect this data, producing research opportunities, outcome standards and a means by which to benchmark trauma centre performance. The Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) is the UK national registry, with data upload being mandatory from all major trauma centres (MTCs), a process which is manual and time and resource intensive. A telephone survey was carried out to collect data from all 26 MTCs in England. A questionnaire was designed to identify how data was collected at a local level, what software and methods were used and what resources were allocated to collect and upload trauma data to the TARN. Further information on hospital size and number of beds was collected from internet searches. Twenty-three MTCs were contacted in total. The majority used Microsoft Excel, with the next most common programme being Bluespier. Other commercially available registries used included Collector, VTOMS and McKesson. One trust created its own software and three used no electronic database at all. Electronic patient record integration was variable and limited to some commercially available registries. The mean number of TARN data collectors was two per centre, with a mean duration of data collection of 4.5 years. The wide range of software options and their lack of integration with the hospital electronic patient records results in the duplication of data as well as requiring time and resources. This may also be due to the difference in data required for coordinating on-going patient care and that required for upload to the TARN. Whilst some of these programmes do have the capabilities for automatic data upload, further efforts must be made to provide a cohesive system that provides the required integration and customisability in order to improve efficiency and ultimately trauma care.

Language: en