Citation

Dorn L, Stephen L, af Wåhlberg AE, Gandolfi J. Ergonomics 2010; 53(12): 1420-1433.

Affiliation

Department of Systems Engineering and Human Factors, Cranfield University, Bedfordshire, UK. l.dorn@cranfield.ac.uk

Copyright

(Copyright © 2010, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/00140139.2010.532882

PMID

21108079

Abstract

There are likely to be individual differences in bus driver behaviour when adhering to strict schedules under time pressure. A reliable and valid assessment of these individual differences would be useful for bus companies keen to mitigate risk of crash involvement. This paper reports on three studies to develop and validate a self-report measure of bus driver behaviour. For study 1, two principal components analyses of a pilot questionnaire revealed six components describing bus driver behaviour and four bus driver coping components. In study 2, test-retest reliability of the components were tested in a sub-sample and found to be adequate. Further, the 10 components were used to predict bus crash involvement at three levels of culpability with consistently significant associations found for two components. For study 3, avoidance coping was consistently associated with celeration variables in a bus simulator, especially for a time-pressured drive. STATEMENT OF RELEVANCE: The instrument can be used by bus companies for driver stress and fatigue management training to identify at-risk bus driver behaviour. Training to reduce the tendency to engage in avoidance coping strategies, improve evaluative coping strategies and hazard monitoring when under stress may improve bus driver safety.

Language: en