Citation

Barth RP, Hacking S, Ash JR. J. Prim. Prev. 1988; 8(4): 201-217.

Affiliation

School of Social Welfare, University of California, 120 Haviland Hall, 94720, Berkeley, CA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1988, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/BF01695023

PMID

24272285

Abstract

Perinatal child abuse prevention projects are increasingly favored but rarely evaluated. The paper describes an experimental evaluation of the Child Parent Enrichment Project (CPEP). Women were referred to the project during or just after pregnancy if identified as at-risk of engaging in child abuse by community professionals. Clients were randomly assigned to CPEP services (n=24) or traditional community services (n=26). CPEP services involved six months of home visiting by paraprofessional women and linkage to other formal and informal community resources. Multivariate Analysis of Covariance on posttest scores, controlling for pretest scores, show advantage for the CPEP group in prenatal care, birth outcomes, better reports of child temperament, and better indicators of child welfare. CPEP mothers tended to report better well-being. No significant differences were demonstrated for levels of formal and informal support. Reports of child abuse were similar for both groups. Consumer satisfaction indicates that clients valued the program. The preliminary results argue for further use and evaluation of perinatal child abuse prevention services.

Language: en