Citation

Siegmund GP, Guskiewicz KM, Marshall SW, Demarco AL, Bonin SJ. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2014; 42(9): 1834-1845.

Affiliation

MEA Forensic Engineers & Scientists, 11-11151 Horseshoe Way, Richmond, BC, V7A 4S5, Canada, gunter.siegmund@meaforensic.com.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2014, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/s10439-014-1052-2

PMID

24920257

Abstract

A headform is needed to validate and compare helmet- and mouthguard-based sensors that measure the severity and direction of football head impacts. Our goal was to quantify the dynamic response of a mandibular load-sensing headform (MLSH) and to compare its performance and repeatability to an unmodified Hybrid III headform. Linear impactors in two independent laboratories were used to strike each headform at six locations at 5.5 m/s and at two locations at 3.6 and 7.4 m/s. Impact severity was quantified using peak linear acceleration (PLA) and peak angular acceleration (PAA), and direction was quantified using the azimuth and elevation of the PLA. Repeatability was quantified using coefficients of variation (COV) and standard deviations (SD). Across all impacts, PLA was 1.6 ± 1.8 g higher in the MLSH than in the Hybrid III (p = 0.002), but there were no differences in PAA (p = 0.25), azimuth (p = 0.43) and elevation (p = 0.11). Both headforms exhibited excellent or acceptable repeatability for PLA (HIII:COV = 2.1 ± 0.8%, MLSH:COV = 2.0 ± 1.2%, p = 0.98), but site-specific repeatability ranging from excellent to poor for PAA (HIII:COV = 7.2 ± 4.0%, MLSH:COV = 8.3 ± 5.8%, p = 0.58). Direction SD were generally <1° and did not vary between headforms. Overall, both headforms are similarly suitable for validating PLA in sensors that measure head impact severity in football players, however their utility for validating sensor PAA values varies with impact location.


Keywords: American football;

Language: en