SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Hita-Contreras F, López EM, Matarín PJG, Guevara NML, Cruz-Díaz D, Ruiz-Ariza A, Martínez-Amat A. Maturitas 2014; 79(3): 322-328.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.07.015

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

OBJECTIVE
The purpose of our study was to investigate the relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and postural stability and the fear of falling in a 50- to 65-year-old postmenopausal population. Study design
A cross-sectional, observational study was conducted on 118 postmenopausal women. According to their BMD values, participants were divided into two groups: BMD > −2.0 SD (n = 95) and ≤−2.0 SD (n = 23). Main outcome measures: Postural stability, assessed with a resistive multi-sensor platform, fear of falling (FoF) and the history of falls in the last 12 months were investigated.

RESULTS
Women with BMD ≤ −2.0 SD reported a significantly increased FoF when compared to women with BMD > −2.0 SD (P = 0.024, η2 = 0.045, 1 − β = 0.624). In the postural stability analysis, the group with BMD ≤ − 2.0 SD showed, under the eyes-open condition, statistically significantly higher values for the velocity (VEO) (P = 0.040, η2 = 0.037, 1 − β = 0.539) and the anteroposterior mean displacement of the center of pressure (YEO; P = 0.017, η2 = 0.049, 1 − β = 0.669). No significant differences between groups were observed in the history of falls or in the rest of the stabilometric analyses.

CONCLUSIONS
In Spanish postmenopausal women under 65 years, a BMD ≤ −2.0 SD is significantly associated with postural instability (elevated VEO and XEO) and an increased FoF, which are two highly influential factors in the risk of falling.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print