SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Piero M, Simone U, Jonathan M, Maria S, Giulio G, Francesco T, Gabriella C, Laura A, Eva B, Gianni M, Francesco C, Giovanni G. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2014; 29(3): 672-677.

Affiliation

1Studio Malpezzi/Amabile, Center of Dental Medicine, via Savena Antico 1 - 40139 Bologna, Italy. 2Department of Biomedical Sciences and Surgical Specialties, University of Ferrara. C.so Ercole I D'Este 32, 44100 - Ferrara Italy 3Cardiology Division, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Stanford University, 3801 Miranda Ave, Palo Alto CA 94304.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2014, National Strength and Conditioning Association)

DOI

10.1519/JSC.0000000000000695

PMID

25226314

Abstract

Mouthguards are frequently used for protection purposes, particularly by athletes competing in contact sports. However, there is increasing evidence supporting their use for improving performance. Studies have focused their use in athletes who do not traditionally use mouthguards and who may be looking for a performance edge. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the influence of a custom made mouthguard (PM) on maximal and submaximal physiological parameters related to performance in road cycling.Ten well-trained amateur road cyclists (34 ± 6 years) performed an incremental cardiopulmonary exercise test to exhaustion on a frictional braked cycle ergometer. Work rate (WR), heart rate, oxygen consumption (VO2), carbon dioxide production, and ventilation at the lactate threshold, at the respiratory compensation point (RCP), and at maximal exercise (MAX) were determined in normal conditions (C) and wearing PM. Cycling economy was also evaluated by analyzing the slope of the VO2/WR (ΔVO2/ΔWR, mL/watt/min) relationship during the test.Wearing the PM compared to C resulted in significant increases in WR at RCP (281 ± 32 vs 266 ± 19 watts, P=0.04) and at MAX (353 ± 44 vs 339 ± 38 watts, P=0.004). The PM also resulted in an average 8% lower ΔVO2/ΔWR (9.5 ± 1.1 vs 10.3 ± 1.1 mL/watt/min, P=0.06) but did not significantly modify any of the other measured parameters at LT, RCP and MAX.To the best of our knowledge this study is the first to evaluate the effects of a dentistry-designed mouthguard on physical performance of road cyclists. These results provide support for cyclists to correct jaw posture which may improve their exercise performance.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print