Citation

Timmerman ME, Brouwer WH. Neuropsychologia 1999; 37(4): 467-478.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands. m.e.timmerman@ppsw.rug.nl

Copyright

(Copyright © 1999, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

10215093

Abstract

As an explanation of the pattern of slow information processing after closed head injury (CHI), hypotheses of impaired access to declarative memory and intact application and acquisition of procedural memory after CHI are presented. These two hypotheses were tested by means of four cognitive reaction-time tasks, a semantic memory task, a memory comparison task, a mental rotation task and a mirror reading task. These tasks were administered on two different days to 12 survivors of a CHI tested more than 5 years after injury and a healthy control group of comparable age and education. In three tasks the difficulty of access to declarative knowledge was varied and it was expected that this would slow the CHI group more than the controls. In two tasks opportunities for procedural learning were provided by repeatedly presenting the same cognitive tasks and in one task, the difficulty of access to procedural memory was varied. It was expected that the CHI group would profit as much from this as would the control group. Both hypotheses were supported.

Language: en