Citation

McGarrity ME, Sinn DL, Gosling SD. Behav. Processes 2014; 110: 117-124.

Affiliation

University of Texas at Austin, Department of Psychology, 108 E. Dean Keeton Stop A8000, Austin, TX 78712-1043, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.beproc.2014.09.029

PMID

25267465

Abstract

With the recent increase in interest in personality in dogs, behavioral assays of their behavior have proliferated. There has been particularly strong interest in predicting adult behavior from puppy tests. As a result, researchers and practitioners seeking to measure personality in puppies are faced with a bewildering array of options and no clear guide as to what behavioral assays have been developed or which personality dimensions those assays measure effectively. To address this issue, we used an 'expert-categorization' procedure-a standardized method often used in the course of meta-analyses-to identify the subset of those assays consensually judged to measure major personality dimensions effectively. We used this procedure to identify all relevant puppy tests and to categorize them in terms of their ability to measure nine personality dimensions identified in previous research (Activity, Aggressiveness, Boldness/Self-assuredness, Exploration, Fearfulness/Nervousness, Reactivity, Sociability, Submissiveness, Trainability/Responsiveness). Specifically, we identified 264 assay subtests, derived from 47 studies, which were subjected to a standardized categorization procedure undertaken independently by six expert judges. These procedures yielded a set of behavioral tests judged to measure the nine dimensions effectively and also demonstrated a widely applicable method for developing and evaluating behavioral test batteries.

Language: en