SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Kenny GP, Larose J, Wright-Beatty HE, Boulay P, Sigal RJ, Flouris AD. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2014; 47(6): 1281-1290.

Affiliation

1Human Environmental Physiological Research Unit, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; 2Faculty of Physical Education and Sports, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada; 3Departments of Medicine, Cardiac Sciences and Community Health Sciences, Faculties of Medicine and Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; 4FAME Laboratory, Department of Exercise Science, University of Thessaly, Trikala, Greece.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2014, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins)

DOI

10.1249/MSS.0000000000000537

PMID

25290744

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aging-induced reduction in whole-body heat loss (HL) capacity generates concerns regarding the continued participation of older workers in occupations such as firefighting. We compared HL and change in body heat storage (S) during intermittent exercise in warm/dry and warm/humid conditions among older male firefighters (OLDER; n=9; age=54.7±2.1 years), older (aged-matched) non-firefighters (NON-FF; n=9; age=52.8±1.2 years), and young firefighters (YOUNG; n=6; age=26.7±0.8 years).

METHODS: We measured evaporative heat loss and dry heat exchange via the Snellen whole-body direct calorimeter while participants performed four 15-min bouts of cycling at 400W of metabolic heat production separated by 15-min recovery periods in warm/dry (35°C, 20% relative humidity) and warm/humid (35°C, 60% relative humidity) conditions.

RESULTS: We found no differences (p>0.05) in HL or cumulative S (ΔS) between OLDER and NON-FF in the warm/dry (ΔS: OLDER=233±26 kJ; NON-FF=270±29 kJ) or warm/humid (ΔS: OLDER=548±24 kJ; NON-FF=504±47 kJ) conditions. The OLDER and NON-FF had lower HL than the YOUNG during exercise in both environmental conditions (p<0.05). The OLDER stored 40% (p>0.05) and 46% (p=0.004) more heat than YOUNG in the warm/dry and warm/humid conditions, respectively. The NON-FF stored 63% (p=0.016) and 34% (p=0.025) more heat than the YOUNG in the dry and humid conditions, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Older firefighters and age-matched non-firefighters demonstrate similar HL and S during work in the heat. Moreover HL is significantly reduced in older compared to younger firefighters during exercise in both warm/dry and warm/humid conditions. Consequently, older firefighters may be more susceptible to thermal injury while on duty than their younger counterparts.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print