Citation

Bell BE, Loftus EF. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1989; 56(5): 669-679.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1989, American Psychological Association)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

2724064

Abstract

Investigated the influence of trivial testimonial detail on judgments of 424 undergraduates who served as mock jurors. Ss read a summary of a court case involving robbery and murder. In Experiment 1, detailed testimony influenced judgments of guilt, even when the detail was unrelated to the culprit. In Experiment 2, detailed testimony was especially powerful when an opposing witness testified that she could not remember the trivial details. Subsequent analyses suggest that the impact of detailed testimony on guilt judgments is mediated by inferences about the eyewitnesses. When eyewitnesses provided more detail, they were generally judged to be more credible, to have a better memory for the culprit's face and for details, and to have paid more attention to the culprit.

Language: en