Citation

Parker GB, Hegarty B, Paterson A, Hadzi-Pavlovic D, Granville-Smith I, Gokiert A. J. Affect. Disord. 2014; 173C: 239-244.

Affiliation

School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Australia; Black Dog Institute, Australia.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.jad.2014.10.066

PMID

25462423

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many variables have been proposed as predictive of post-natal depression (PND). AIMS: To investigate and refine PND risk variables.

METHOD: We recruited a large sample and employed two measures of PND (the dimensional Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale or EPDS, and DSM-defined major depression).

RESULTS: High levels of stress in the post-natal period, previous depression and higher depression scores during pregnancy were the only consistent predictors across measures. Those exceeding the EPDS cut-off had additional psychosocial risk factors while those meeting criteria for major depression were strongly predicted by a past history of depression as well as higher pre-natal state depression scores. LIMITATIONS: The EPDS has been used with variable cut off scores across multiple studies. We used only nine of the 10 EPDS items, electing to exclude the self-harm related question, but preserving the recommended EPDS cut-off score, and which might have impacted on predictions.

CONCLUSIONS: Study results generated a refined set of predictors of PND but, more importantly, identified that predictors of PND status are distinctly influenced by the measure of PND. Such inconsistencies are intrinsically noteworthy and of potential key importance in shaping intervention strategies.

Language: en