Citation

Whittaker JL, Small C, Maffey L, Emery CA. Br. J. Sports Med. 2015; 49(12): 803-809.

Affiliation

Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport Injury Prevention Research Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada Department of Pediatrics and Department of Community Health Sciences, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute for Child and Maternal Health, Cummings School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, BMJ Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1136/bjsports-2014-094287

PMID

25833903

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The identification of risk factors for groin injury in sport is important to develop and implement injury prevention strategies.

OBJECTIVE: To identify and evaluate the evidence examining risk factors for groin injury in sport. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Nine electronic databases were systematically searched to June 2014. Studies selected met the following criteria: original data; analytic design; investigated a risk factor(s); included outcomes for groin injury sustained during sport participation. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed and two independent authors assessed the quality and level of evidence with the Downs and Black (DB) criteria and Oxford Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine model, respectively.

RESULTS: Of 2521 potentially relevant studies, 29 were included and scored. Heterogeneity in methodology and injury definition precluded meta-analyses. The most common risk factors investigated included age, hip range of motion, hip adductor strength and height. The median DB score across studies was 11/33 (range 6-20). The majority of studies represented level 2 evidence (cohort studies) however few considered the inter-relationships between risk factors. There is level 1 and 2 evidence that previous groin injury, higher-level of play, reduced hip adductor (absolute and relative to the hip abductors) strength and lower levels of sport-specific training are associated with increased risk of groin injury in sport.

CONCLUSIONS: We recommended that investigators focus on developing and evaluating preparticipation screening and groin injury prevention programmes through high-quality randomised controlled trials targeting athletes at greater risk of injury.

Language: en