SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Li L, Scherpbier R, Wu J, Zhu X, Zhang W, Zhang L, Gao X, Luo J, Hu G. Bull. World Health Organ. 2015; 93(3): 169-175.

Affiliation

Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Central South University, 110 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410078, China .

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, World Health Organization)

DOI

10.2471/BLT.14.139998

PMID

25838612

PMCID

PMC4371490

Abstract

To examine the extent to which effective interventions to prevent unintentional child injury are reflected in the laws and regulations of China.
METHODS:
We focused on the six common causes of fatal child injuries - drowning, road traffic injury, falls, poisoning, burns and suffocation. We investigated 27 interventions recommended by the United Nations Children's Fund, the World Health Organization or the European Child Safety Alliance. We searched China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Lawyee for Chinese legislations using keywords and synonyms for the 27 interventions. We reviewed the identified legislations for statements specifying the responsible implementation department.
FINDINGS:
Seven national laws, nine regulations of the State Council and 46 departmental regulations were found to relate to at least one of the interventions. Although seven of the 27 internationally recommended interventions were covered by Chinese laws, 10 were not covered by any current Chinese law or regulation. None of the interventions against drowning and falls that we investigated was covered by national laws. The implementation responsibilities for effective interventions were either not specified or were assigned to multiple governmental departments in 11 or 20 legislative documents, respectively.
CONCLUSION:
In Chinese laws and regulations, interventions proven to prevent major causes of unintentional child injuries are underrepresented and the associated implementation responsibilities are often poorly defined. China should include all such interventions in laws and regulations, and assign implementation responsibility for each to a single department of the national government.


Language: en

Vernacular Abstract

目的:
调查中国法律法规在多大程度上反映预防儿童非故意伤害的有效干预措施。.
方法:
我们把重点放在六种常见的致命儿童受伤原因:溺水、道路交通伤害、跌落、中毒、烧伤和窒息。我们研究了由联合国儿童基金会、世界卫生组织和欧洲儿童安全联盟建议的27种干预措施。我们使用这27种干预措施的关键字和同义词在中国国家知识基础设施(中国知网)和北大法意进行检索。我们分析了被识别法律法规有关干预执行的部门职责分工阐述。.
结果:
发现7项国家法律、9项国务院规定和46项部门条例与至少一种干预措施相关。虽然国际推荐的27种干预措施中在中国法律中包含了7种,但有10种措施在当前中国任何法律或法规中都没有涉及。国家法律没有涉及我们所调查的任何防溺水和防跌落干预措施。有效干预措施的实施责任在11个立法文件未明确指定,在20个立法文件中被分派给多个政府部门。.
结论:
在中国的法律法规中,已被证明能预防儿童非故意伤害主因的干预并未得到充分体现,相关实施责任常常界定不清。中国应该在法律法规中包括所有这类干预措施,并将每项实施责任指派到单一的国家政府部门。.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print