SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Zhang X, Zhou Q. Traffic Injury Prev. 2016; 17(3): 313-319.

Affiliation

a State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy, Department of Automotive Engineering , Tsinghua University , Beijing , 100084 , China.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/15389588.2015.1064908

PMID

26148123

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated overall performance of an energy-absorbing sliding seat concept for whiplash neck injury prevention. The sliding seat allows its seat pan to slide backward for some distance under certain restraint force to absorb crash energy in rear impacts.

METHODS: A numerical model that consisted of vehicle interior, seat, seatbelt and BioRID II dummy was built in MADYMO to evaluate whiplash neck injury in rear impact. A parametric study of the effects of sliding seat parameters, including position and cushion stiffness of head restraint, seatback cushion stiffness, recliner characteristics and especially, sliding energy-absorbing (EA) restraint force, on neck injury criteria was conducted in order to compare the effectiveness of the sliding seat concept with that of other existing anti-whiplash mechanisms. Optimal sliding-seat-design configurations in rear crashes of different severities were obtained. A sliding seat prototype with bending of a steel strip as EA mechanism was fabricated and tested in sled test environment to validate the concept. Performances of the sliding seat under frontal and rollover impacts were checked to make sure the sliding mechanism did not bring any negative effects.

RESULTS: The protection effect of the sliding seat with EA restraint force is comparable with that of head restraint-based and recliner stiffness-based anti-whiplash mechanisms. EA restraint force levels of 3 kN in rear impacts of low and medium severities and 6 kN in high severity were obtained from optimization. In frontal collision and rollover, compared to non-sliding seat, the sliding seat does not bring any negative effects on occupant protection. The sled test results of the sliding seat prototype have shown the effectiveness of the concept for reducing neck injury risks.

CONCLUSION: As a countermeasure, the sliding seat with appropriate restraint forces can significantly reduce whiplash neck injury risk in rear impacts of low, medium and high severities with no negative effects on other crash load cases.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print