CONTACT US: Contact info
|
Citation |
Copes H, Cardwell S, Sloan JJ. J. Crim. Justice Educ. 2012; 23(4): 441-461. |
|
Copyright |
(Copyright © 2012, Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences (U.S.A.), Publisher Informa - Taylor and Francis Group) |
|
DOI |
|
PMID |
unavailable |
|
Abstract |
Because Scopus and metrics like the h-index and m-quotient have become increasingly popular for assessing the impact of social science scholarship, criminology and criminal justice (CCJ) departments may be tempted to use those metrics when making important decisions like tenure and promotion. However, since no discipline-wide standards based on those metrics yet exist, CCJ departments have no comparative basis for interpreting the results of citation analyses of a particular faculty member's scholarship. To identify what a set of disciplinary standards might look like, we used Scopus and calculated mean and median h-index and m-quotient values for faculty members (n = 504) in CCJ Ph.D. granting departments (n = 35) by rank and for editorial board members (n = 91) of Criminology, Justice Quarterly, and the Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. Our results illustrate how comparative disciplinary standards could be developed and used by those in CCJ departments to assess the impact of faculty members' scholarship. |