SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Toch H. Crim. Justice Behav. 1981; 8(1): 3-14.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1981, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/009385488100800101

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

A problem with classification in prisons is that of disjunctures between recommendations based on classification data and the process whereby inmate assignments are made. This problem is aggravated by crowding, which limits differential assignment to extreme cases, such as inmates who have trouble surviving. Forging classification-assignment links presupposes communication among staff who successively deal with each inmate; classification recommendations must also be program-relevant and flexibly updated to take adjustment data into account. Nonclassification staff and inmates must have input into classification decisions. If possible, this input should be collaborative. Information exchange among staff runs into a concern with "confidentiality." Where classifiers protect confidentiality, they risk having recommendations ignored or circumvented. They also run this risk if they view classification as an autonomous process or function.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print