SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Wiznia DH, Kim CY, Dai F, Goel A, Leslie MP. Traffic Injury Prev. 2016; 17(6): 633-637.

Affiliation

Yale School of Medicine , Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/15389588.2015.1136059

PMID

26889888

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The state of Connecticut has a partial motorcycle helmet law, which has been linked to one of the lowest helmet compliance rates in the Northeast. We examine the clinical and financial impact of low motorcycle helmet use in the state of Connecticut.

METHODS A retrospective cohort study comparing the outcomes between helmeted and non-helmeted motorcycle crash victims over a 12.5-year period, from July 2, 2002 to December 31, 2013. All patients who were admitted to the hospital after a motorcycle crash were included in the study. Patients were stratified into helmeted and non-helmeted cohorts. Group differences were compared using t-test or Wilcoxon rank test for continuous variables and chi-square test for dichotomous outcomes. Regression models were created to evaluate predictors of helmet use, alcohol and drugs as confounding variables, and factors that influenced hospital costs.

RESULTS The registry included 986 eligible patients. Of this group, 335 (34%) were helmeted and 651 (66%) were non-helmeted. Overall, non-helmeted patients had a worse clinical presentation, with lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS, p < 0.01), higher Injury Severity Score (ISS, p < 0.01), higher incidence of loss of consciousness (LOC, p < 0.01), longer intensive care unit (ICU, p < 0.01) admissions, and higher incidence of head (p < 0.01) or face injuries (p < 0.01). Non-helmeted patients were also twice as more likely to die from their injuries (p = 0.04, OR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.02 - 3.45). Financially, non-helmeted patients incurred mean hospital costs of $18,458 while helmeted patients incurred $14,970 (p = 0.18). ISS, GCS, and ICU length of stay were significantly correlated with increased hospital costs (p < 0.01). Not using a helmet was a significant predictor of mortality (p = 0.04) after adjusting for alcohol/drug use and age.

CONCLUSIONS Helmet use is associated with lower injury severity and increased survival after a motorcycle crash. These outcomes remained consistent even after controlling for age, alcohol and drug use. The medical and financial impact of Connecticut's partial helmet law should be carefully evaluated to petition for increased education and enforcement of helmet use.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print