SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Di Deo P, Lingsma H, Nieboer D, Roozenbeek B, Citerio G, Beretta L, Magnoni S, Zanier ER, Stocchetti N. J. Neurotrauma 2016; 33(22): 2019-2025.

Affiliation

Ospedale Policlinico, Neurorianimazione Beretta Neuro , via F.Sforza, 22 , Milano, Italy , 20122 ; stocchet@policlinico.mi.it.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, Mary Ann Liebert Publishers)

DOI

10.1089/neu.2015.4026

PMID

26943781

Abstract

Prognostic models for traumatic brain injury (TBI) are important tools both in clinical practice and research, if properly validated, preferably by external validation. Prognostic models offer also the possibility of monitoring performance, by comparing predicted to observed outcomes. In this study we applied the prognostic models developed by the International Mission on Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in TBI (IMPACT) in an Italian multicentre database (Neurolink) with two aims: to compare observed with predicted outcomes and to check for a possible improvement of clinical outcome over the 11 years of patient inclusion in Neurolink. We applied the IMPACT models to patients included in Neurolink between 1997 to 2007. Performance of the models was assessed by determining calibration (with calibration plots) and discrimination (by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)). Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze a possible trend in outcomes over time, adjusted for predicted outcomes. A total of 1401 patients were studied. Patients had a median age of 40 years and 51% had a Glasgow Coma Score Motor of 5 or 6. The models showed good discrimination with AUCs of 0.86 (according to the Core model) and 0.88 (Extended model), and adequate calibration, with the overall observed risk of unfavorable outcome and mortality being less than predicted. Outcomes significantly improved over time. This study shows that the IMPACT models performed reasonably well in the Neurolink data and can be used for monitoring performance. After adjustment for predicted outcomes with the prognostic models, we observed a substantial improvement of patient outcomes over time in the three Neurolink centers.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print