SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Burkhouse KL, Kujawa A, Kennedy AE, Shankman SA, Langenecker SA, Phan KL, Klumpp H. Depress. Anxiety 2016; 33(4): 281-288.

Affiliation

Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1002/da.22482

PMID

27038409

PMCID

PMC4818973

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a well-established treatment for anxiety and depression; however, response to CBT is heterogeneous across patients and many remain symptomatic after therapy, raising the need to identify prospective predictors for treatment planning. Altered neural processing of reward has been implicated in both depression and anxiety, and improving hedonic capacity is a goal of CBT. However, little is known about how neural response to reward relates to CBT outcomes in depression and anxiety. The current study used the reward positivity (RewP) event-related potential (ERP) component to examine whether neural reactivity to reward would predict CBT response in a sample of patients with anxiety without depression (n = 30) and comorbid anxiety and depression (CAD, n = 22).

METHODS: Participants completed a guessing reward ERP paradigm before completing 12 weeks of standard CBT.

RESULTS: The majority of the sample (68%; 35 out of 52 patients) responded to treatment, and those with a reduced RewP at baseline were more likely to respond to treatment. A reduced RewP was also associated with a greater pre-to-post CBT reduction in depressive symptoms among individuals with CAD, but not among individuals with pure anxiety.

CONCLUSIONS: CBT may be most beneficial in reducing depressive symptoms for individuals who demonstrate decreased reward reactivity prior to treatment. CBT may target reward brain function, leading to greater improvement in symptoms. These effects may be strongest, and therefore most meaningful, for individuals with reward-processing deficits prior to treatment.

© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print