SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Nasar JL. Hum. Factors 1981; 23(4): 439-445.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1981, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/001872088102300406

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The influence of variations in space on affective response has not been widely researched. This study investigated the relationship of variations in height, width/depth, and shape to affective responses. Each of 120 respondents was asked to sort, by preference, models of spaces which represented, at one-twelfth scale, all possible combinations of 2.14-m and 6.10-m heights with 1.52-m, 3.05-m, or 6.05-m widths and depths. The results of the chi-square analyses indicate that respondents felt more secure in response to models 2.44 m high than to models 6.10 m high, more pleased in response to the models of square rather than rectangular spaces, and more secure, pleased, and interested, on the average, in response to models of wide rather than narrow spaces. The need for further investigations for special populations and contexts is described and speculations about the implications of this research for use in designing actual settings are discussed.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print