Citation

Palmentier JPFP, Woodall KL, Savoia C. J. Can. Soc. Forensic Sci. 2016; 49(3): 127-137.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, Canadian Society of Forensic Science, Publisher Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/00085030.2016.1184839

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Retrospective analysis of the incidence of Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) exception messages obtained during testing of suspected impaired drivers on the Intoxilyzer® 5000C over a 13-year period (1997 to 2009) was examined in order to address concerns on the hypothetical impact of RFI on breath alcohol testing. RFI messages were rare, occurring in less than 0.48% (n = 128) of the 26,939 drivers tested. Multiple RFI messages were even more infrequent, occurring in only 10.2% of RFI-positive cases (n = 13). There was no significant effect of the incidence of RFI messages attributable to a particular testing location (p = 0.98), a specific instrument (p = 0.98), or year of testing (p = 0.99). In addition, the data show no evidence that hypothetical "undetected" RFI events, in addition to those already detected by the instrument, affected either the calibration check results or the subject breath tests in this study. Instruments are designed with an RFI detection system and shielding to protect the internal electronics against RFI. The breath testing procedure requiring two tests in good agreement (within 20 mg/100 mL truncated) is an additional safeguard against "undetected" RFI impacting the tests, and serves to increase the scientific confidence in the results obtained.

Language: en