SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Sansosti LE, Rocha ZM, Lawrence MW, Meyr AJ. J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2016; 106(sp1): e1.

Affiliation

Associate Professor and Residency Program Director, Department of Podiatric Surgery, Temple University School of Podiatric Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania ( AJMeyr@gmail.com ) *

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, American Podiatric Medical Association)

DOI

10.7547/8750-7315-2016.1.Sansosti

PMID

27649396

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Immobilization devices such as surgical shoes and walking boots are commonly prescribed by podiatric physicians in the treatment of a variety of lower extremity pathologies and during the post-operative recovery period, but may have the potential to affect a patient’s ability to maintain a safe level of control over the accelerator and brake pedals while operating an automobile. The objective of this investigation was to assess driving outcomes in a group of healthy participants under variable foot wear conditions.

METHODS: Following IRB approval, the braking performances of participants were evaluated with a computerized driving simulator. We assessed three driving outcomes (mean emergency brake response time, frequency of abnormally delayed braking responses, and frequency of inaccurate brake responses) under three variable footwear conditions (regular shoe gear, surgical shoe, and walking boot).

RESULTS: We found that mean brake response times were abnormally delayed in the walking boot compared to both the regular shoe (0.736 seconds vs. 0.575 seconds, p < 0.001 seconds) and surgical shoe (0.736 seconds vs. 0.611 seconds, p < 0.001). We found that abnormally delayed brake responses occurred more frequently in the surgical shoe (18.5% vs. 2.5%, p < 0.001) and the walking boot (55.5% vs. 2.5%, p < 0.001) compared to the regular shoe. And we found that inaccurate brake responses occurred more frequently in the walking boot compared to both the surgical shoe (18.0% vs. 4.0%, p < 0.001) and the regular shoe (18.0% vs. 2.0%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: The results of these investigations provide podiatric physicians with a better understanding of how to assess the risk and how to appropriately advise their patients who have been prescribed lower extremity immobilization devices with respect to the safe operation of an automobile.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print