Citation

Arvinen-Barrow M, Clement D, Hamson-Utley JJ, Kaphoff C, Zakrajsek R, Lee SM, Hemmings B, Lintunen T, Martin SB. J. Sport Rehab. 2016; 25(4): 338-347.

Affiliation

Department of Kinesiology, Health Promotion, and Recreation, University of North Texas, Denton, TX.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, Human Kinetics Publishers)

DOI

10.1123/jsr.2015-0018

PMID

27632833

Abstract

CONTEXT: Athletes enter injury rehabilitation with certain expectations about the recovery process, outcomes, and the professional providing treatment. Their expectations influence the effectiveness of the assistance received and affect the overall rehabilitation process. Expectations may vary depending on numerous factors such as sport experience, gender, sport-type and cultural background. Unfortunately, limited information is available on athletes' expectations about sport injury rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE: To examine possible differences in athletes' expectations about sport injury rehabilitation based on their country of residence and type of sport (physical contact versus non-physical contact).

DESIGN: A cross-sectional design. SETTING: Recreational, collegiate, and professional athletes from the United States (US), United Kingdom (UK) and Finland were surveyed. PARTICIPANTS: Of the 1209 athletes ranging from 12 to 80 years of age (Mage = 23.46 ± 7.91), of which 529 US [80%], 253 UK [86%], and 199 Finnish [82%] provided details of their geographical location, were included in the final analyses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Expectations about Athletic Training (EAAT) questionnaire was used to determine athletes' expectations about personal commitment, facilitative conditions, and the expertise of the sports medicine professional (Clement et al., 2012).

RESULTS: 3x2 MANCOVA revealed significant main effects for country (p =.0001, ηp2 =.055) and sport type (p =.0001, ηp2 =.023). Specifically, US athletes were found to have higher expectations of personal commitment and facilitative conditions than their UK and Finnish counterparts. Athletes participating in physical contact sports had higher expectations of facilitative conditions and the expertise of the sports medicine professional (SMP) as compared to athletes participating in non-physical contact sports.

CONCLUSIONS: SMPs, especially those in the US, should consider the sport and environment when providing services. In addition, SMPs need to highlight and demonstrate their expertise during the rehabilitation process, especially for those who compete in physical contact sports.

Language: en