Citation

Phanthanourak AL, Cleworth TW, Adkin AL, Carpenter MG, Tokuno CD. Gait Posture 2016; 50: 145-150.

Affiliation

Department of Kinesiology, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada. Electronic address: ctokuno@brocku.ca.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.08.031

PMID

27611062

Abstract

This study examined how postural threat in the form of a potential perturbation affects an individual's ability to perform a heel raise. Seventeen adults completed three conditions: i) low threat, where participants performed a heel raise in response to a "go" tone, ii) high threat, where participants either heard the same "go" tone, for which they performed a heel raise, or experienced a support surface translation in the medio-lateral direction that disturbed their balance, and iii) choice reaction time task, where participants either completed a heel raise in response to the same "go" tone or a toe raise in response to a lower pitched tone. For all heel raise trials, anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) were quantified from center of pressure (COP) recordings and electromyographic (EMG) activity from the tibialis anterior (TA) and soleus (SOL).

RESULTS indicated that participants exhibited larger APAs, as reflected by the greater backward COP displacement (p=0.038) and velocity (p=0.022) as well as a larger TA EMG amplitude (p=0.045), during the high threat condition. During the execution phase of the heel raise, an earlier (p=0.014) and larger (p=0.041) SOL EMG activation were observed during the high threat condition. These results contrast with previous findings of reduced APAs when the postural threat was evoked through changes in surface height. Therefore, the characteristics of the postural threat must be considered to isolate the effects of threat on anticipatory movement control.

Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Language: en