Citation

Rea MS, Bullough JD. Transp. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2016; 43: 36-47.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.trf.2016.09.018

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Yellow flashing warning beacons help protect front line service workers, including those in transportation, utility and construction sectors. To safeguard these workers, beacons should be readily detected and should provide veridical information about their relative movement. Two psychophysical laboratory experiments were conducted to provide empirical foundations for two aspects of warning beacon performance, detection and judgments of relative movement. In the first experiment reaction times were measured to the onset of flashing warning beacons varying in peak intensity while observers viewed different scene conditions. Observers also judged the visibility of nearby low-contrast targets in the presence of the flashing warning beacons. Asymptotic response times to the onset of beacons occurred when their peak intensity was at least 750 cd during daytime. Visibility of low contrast targets during nighttime, when glare is most critical, did not decrease substantially when the peak intensity was below 2000 cd. In the second experiment response times were measured to warning beacons of different flash-sequence patterns as they approached the observer. Judgments of gap closure were improved, relative to fully-on/fully-off flashing, with flash sequences where the minimum beacon intensity was at least 10% of the peak intensity and with two synchronized flashing beacons rather than one. With regard to performance specifications, the minimum value for the peak intensity of warning beacons should be 750 cd, with a maximum value of 2000 cd for detection. Fully-on/fully-off flash sequences should be changed to fully-on/partial-off to enhance judgments of gap closure on moving vehicles. Moreover, two flashing warning beacons, rather than one, should be mounted on service vehicles to improve gap closure judgments.

Copyright © 2016, Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Language: en