CONTACT US: Contact info
|
Citation |
Olivers CN, Awh E, Van der Burg E. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2016; 42(12): 2115-2124. |
|
Affiliation |
Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. |
|
Copyright |
(Copyright © 2016, American Psychological Association) |
|
DOI |
|
PMID |
27854458 |
|
Abstract |
Visual attention serves to select salient and relevant events from the visual input. Selective attention to a visual event can be driven by a synchronous sound. Interestingly, recent evidence suggests that a sound can only drive selection of 1 concurrent visual event, suggesting that attentional capacity is much lower for audiovisual events than for purely visual events. Here we corroborate and extend this finding using a mixture modeling technique that distinguishes between the probability and precision of perception. Observers were presented with displays of multiple continuously flickering objects, of which either 1 or 2 were coupled to a single sound. In 2 experiments, we found that the probability of correctly reporting an object was almost halved when the number of synchronized visual objects increased from 1 to 2. Precision, however, was not affected. This indicates that rather than attention being distributed across multiple simultaneous audiovisual events, just 1 of them is singled out for attentional selection. This was not due to a capacity limit for selecting the visual objects per se; pure visual cues elicited a much higher probability of report and in that case there were clear declines in precision at larger set sizes, indicating the concurrent selection of multiple items. The results point toward a dissociation in capacity for visually and aurally cued prioritization of visual objects. (PsycINFO Database Record Language: en |