SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Bohl DD, Ondeck NT, Samuel AM, Diaz-Collado PJ, Nelson SJ, Basques BA, Leslie MP, Grauer JN. Foot Ankle Spec. 2016; 10(5): 402-410.

Affiliation

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (NTO, AMS, PJDC, SJN, MPL, JNG) jonathan.grauer@yale.edu.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/1938640016679703

PMID

27895200

Abstract

Background This study uses the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) to update the field on the demographics, injury mechanisms, and concurrent injuries among a national sample of patients admitted to the hospital department with calcaneus fractures.

METHODS Patients with calcaneus fractures in the NTDB during 2011-2012 were identified and assessed.

RESULTS A total of 14 516 patients with calcaneus fractures were included. The most common comorbidity was hypertension (18%), and more than 90% of fractures occurred via traffic accident (49%) or fall (43%). A total of 11 137 patients had concurrent injuries. Associated lower extremity fractures had the highest incidence and occurred in 61% of patients (of which the most common were other foot and ankle fractures). Concurrent spine fractures occurred in 23% of patients (of which the most common were lumbar spine fractures). Concurrent nonorthopaedic injuries included head injuries in 18% of patients and thoracic organ injuries in 15% of patients.

CONCLUSION This national sample indicates that associated injuries occur in more than three quarters calcaneus fracture patients. The most common associated fractures are in close proximity to the calcaneus. Although the well-defined association of calcaneus fractures with lumbar spine fractures was identified, the data presented highlight additional strong associations of calcaneus fractures with other orthopaedic and nonorthopaedic injuries. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic, Level III: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected cohort.

© 2016 The Author(s).


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print