SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Fell JC, Fisher DA, Yao J, McKnight AS. Traffic Injury Prev. 2017; 18(6): 557-565.

Affiliation

Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation , Calverton , MD.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/15389588.2017.1285401

PMID

28107050

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Studies of alcohol-related harm (violence, injury, illness) suggest that the most significant risk factors are the amount of alcohol consumed and whether obviously intoxicated patrons continue to be served. This study's objective was to investigate the effects of a responsible beverage service (RBS)/enhanced alcohol enforcement intervention on bars, bar patrons, and impaired driving.

METHOD: Two communities-Monroe County, NY, and Cleveland, OH-participated in a demonstration program and evaluation. The intervention applied RBS training, targeted enforcement, and corrective actions by law enforcement to a random sample of 10 identified problem bars in each community compared to 10 matched non-intervention problem bars. Data were collected over three waves on bar serving practices, bar patron intoxication, drinking and driving, and other alcohol-related harm from intervention and control bars and treatment and comparison communities.

RESULTS: In Monroe County, NY, of the 14 outcome measures analyzed, 7 measures showed statistically significant differences from pre to post-intervention. Six of those measures indicated changes in the desired or positive direction while two measures were in the undesired or negative direction. Of note in the positive direction, the percentage of intervention bar patrons who were intoxicated decreased from 44% to 27% and the average blood alcohol concentration of patrons decreased from.097 g/dL to.059 g/dL pre to post intervention. In Cleveland, OH, 6 of the 14 measures showed statistically significant changes pre to post intervention with 6 in the positive direction and 4 in the negative direction. Of note, the percentage of pseudo-intoxicated patrons denied service in intervention bars increased from 6% to 29%.

CONCLUSIONS: Of the 14 outcome measures that were analyzed in each community, most indicated positive changes associated with the intervention, but others showed negative associations. About half of the measures showed no significance, the sample sizes were too small or the data were unavailable. Therefore, at best, the results of these demonstration programs were mixed. There were, however, some positive indications from the intervention. It appears that when bar managers and owners are aware of the program and its enforcement and when servers are properly trained in RBS, fewer patrons may become intoxicated and greater efforts may be made to deny service to obviously intoxicated patrons. Given that about half of arrested impaired drivers had their last drink at a licensed establishment, widespread implementation of this strategy has the potential to help reduce impaired driving.


Language: en

Keywords

Responsible beverage service training; alcohol policy enforcement; bar patron intoxication; impaired driving; overservice of alcohol; young adult drivers

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print