Citation

Uhl CA, Rhyner KJ, Terrance CA, Plumm KM. Violence Vict. 2017; 32(2): 299-310.

Affiliation

University of North Dakota.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Springer Publishing)

DOI

10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-15-00054

PMID

28130904

Abstract

Because of varying legal definitions across jurisdictions, factors that influence judgments of what constitutes stalking are important to identify. In this study, participants (N = 147) were randomly assigned to read 1 of 4 vignettes involving a hypothetical case of stalking, stemming from a 2 (threat level: explicit vs. implicit) × 2 (victim response: fear vs. anger) between-subjects factorial design. Overall, when the threat was implicit or the victim responded with anger, participants were less inclined to view the scenario as representative of stalking. An interaction further revealed that when the threat was explicit, participants were more likely to rate the perpetrator’s behavior as severe when the victim responded with fear, as opposed to anger. Implications are discussed.

Language: en