SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Hofheinz M, Mibs M. Gerontol. Geriatr. Med. 2016; 2: e2333721416637798.

Affiliation

Neuromuskuläres Therapiezentrum Dresden, Germany.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, The Author(s), Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/2333721416637798

PMID

28138492

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim is to examine the prognostic validity of the Timed Up and Go Test with a cognitive and a manual dual task for predicting the risk of falls.

METHOD: A follow-up study was performed. The data were recorded for 120 volunteers in an outpatient physiotherapy center, with a 12-month follow-up. The sample included 120 elderly men and women aged 60 to 87 years (M age = 72.2 years) living at home. The main measurements were as follows: The Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), the TUG with a cognitive dual task (TUGcog), and the TUG with a manual dual task (TUGman) and falls.

RESULTS: In the 12-month follow-up, 37 persons (30.8%) had a locomotive fall. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve shows significant results for the TUGcog. The area under the curve is 0.65 (p =.008), with a 95% confidence interval (CI) = [0.55, 0.76]. For the TUGman, the area under the curve is 0.57 with a 95% CI = [0.45, 0.68], which is not significant (p =.256). For the TUG, the area under the curve is 0.58, which is not significant (p =.256), 95% CI = [0.47, 0.69].

CONCLUSION: The TUGcog is a valid prognostic assessment to predict falls in community-dwelling elderly people.


Language: en

Keywords

assessments; dual task; fall risk; falls; validity

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print