SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Pletcher ER, Williams VJ, Abt JP, Morgan PM, Parr JJ, Wohleber MF, Lovalekar M, Sell TC. J. Athl. Train. 2017; 52(2): 129-136.

Affiliation

Michael W. Krzyzewski Human Performance Laboratory (K-Lab), DUMC 102916, Duke University, Durham, NC.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, National Athletic Trainers' Association (USA))

DOI

10.4085/1062-6050-52.1.05

PMID

28140624

Abstract

CONTEXT:  Postural stability is the ability to control the center of mass in relation to a person's base of support and can be affected by both musculoskeletal injury and traumatic brain injury. The NeuroCom Sensory Organization Test (SOT) can be used to objectively quantify impairments to postural stability. The ability of postural stability to predict injury and be used as an acute injury-evaluation tool makes it essential to the screening and rehabilitation process. To our knowledge, no published normative data of the SOT from a healthy, highly active population are available for use as a reference for clinical decision making.

OBJECTIVE:  To present a normative database of SOT scores from a US Military Special Operations population that can be used for future comparison.

DESIGN:  Cross-sectional study. SETTING:  Human performance research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS:  A total of 542 active military operators from Air Force Special Operations Command (n = 121), Army Special Operations Command (n = 171), Naval Special Warfare Command, Sea, Air, and Land (n = 101), and Naval Special Warfare Combatant-Craft Crewmen (n = 149). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S):  Participants performed each of the 6 SOT conditions and 3 times. Scores for each condition, total equilibrium composite score, and ratio scores for the somatosensory, visual, and vestibular systems were recorded.

RESULTS:  Differences were present across all groups for SOT conditions 1 (P =.000), 2 (P =.001), 4 (P =.000), 5 (P =.000), and 6 (P =.001) and total equilibrium composite (P =.000), visual (P =.000), vestibular (P =.002), and preference (P =.000) NeuroCom scores.

CONCLUSIONS:  Statistical differences were evident in the distribution of postural stability across US Special Operations Forces personnel. This normative database for postural stability, as assessed by the NeuroCom SOT, can provide context when clinicians assess a Special Operations Forces population or any other groups that maintain a high level of conditioning and training.


Language: en

Keywords

NeuroCom; Sensory Organization Test; normative data

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print