SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

van Niekerk A, Tonsing S, Seedat M, Jacobs R, Ratele K, McClure RJ. Glob. Health Action 2015; 8(1): e27649.

Affiliation

Monash Injury Research Institute Monash University, Melbourne , Australia.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, Centre for Global Health Research (CGH) at UmeĆ„ University, Sweden, Publisher Co-Action Publishing)

DOI

10.3402/gha.v8.27649

PMID

28156763

Abstract

Background South Africa has a significant violence problem. The exposure of girls and women to interpersonal violence is widespread, and the victimization of men, especially to severe and homicidal forms of aggression, is of considerable concern, with male homicide eight times the global rate. In the last two decades, there have been a plethora of South African policies to promote safety. However, indications suggest that the policy response to violence is not coherently formulated, comprehensive, or evenly implemented.

OBJECTIVE This study examines selected South African national legislative instruments in terms of their framing and definition of violence and its typology, vulnerable populations, and prevention. Design This study comprises a directed content analysis of selected legislative documents from South African ministries mandated to prevent violence and its consequences or tasked with the prevention of key contributors to violence. Documents were selected using an electronic keyword search method and analyzed independently by two researchers.

RESULTS The legislative documents recognized the high levels of violence, confirmed the prioritization of selected vulnerable groups, especially women, children, disabled persons, and rural populations, and above all drew on criminological perspectives to emphasize tertiary prevention interventions. There is a policy focus on the protection and support of victims and the prosecution of perpetrators, but near absent recognition of men as victims.

CONCLUSIONS There is a need to broaden the policy framework from primarily criminological and prosecutorial perspectives to include public health contributions. It is likewise important to enlarge the conceptions of vulnerability to include men alongside other vulnerable groups. These measures are important for shaping and resourcing prevention decisions and strengthening primary prevention approaches to violence.


Language: en

Keywords

South Africa; gender; policy; prevention; violence; vulnerable groups

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print